The Haunting in Connecticut

This movie was deliciously creepy (yea, deliciously... as in, if it were a food I would eat it!)

Basically it's a ghost story, akin to the Amityville horror: Family moves into house. House creeps the fuck out of family. Family gets its sanity fondled by ghosts. So on and so forth... I won't give too much away.

A trend with horror movies is that they lack a certain originality that most movies *don't have either*, so if you're one of those nit-picking "movie critics" that believes that a movie can't be good if it's not 100% fresh, than this isn't your movie. But if you like creepy ghost movies that will get you to jump more than once, see this movie.

Note: This movie didn't have any trailers/previews before it started, so I'm not even sure what kind of horror movies I can expect to come in the near future.... what a downer!

Last House on the Left

What a movie that was....

It starts off a bit slow (actually the movie moves at a weird speed, and it definitely felt a lot different than most of the movies already out there)

The storyline was nothing out of this world: Girl goes with family to the middle of nowhere, girl meets boy in the middle of nowhere, girl finds out boy's family is psychotic, boy's family tortures girl, and so forth....

What sets this movie apart is the shock-value... It includes things as tame as a rape scene (okay, not so tame), to as gross as watching someone stitch the skin on a guy's nose with a freakin' thread and needle (un-anesthetized), and watching someone's hand get majorly farked up by garbage disposal in a sink...

the ending was fitting of the movie, and I recommend anyone remotely interested in slasher flicks, horror flicks, or anything in that genre to see this movie...

To run or walk, that is the question...

So I saw Friday the 13th, the Uninvited, and this older movie called Léon the Professional, and I liked them all... but I mostly liked Friday the 13th.. In a nutshell, it revitalized an aging franchise while being the successful embodiment of what a good horror movie should be. There was some comedy (honestly, the director knows who's watching his movie, and definitely appeals to the viewer with the humor), but more importantly, there was a serious can of whoop-ass opened up throughout the movie (their was only one person doing the whooping, and I won't insult your intelligence anymore than that)...

Now I'll just say you should definitely go out and see Friday the 13th, but that brings me to what I've been thinking about for a few days now... what makes the horror figure all that scary?... In my head I can conceptualize two basic archetypes of what a horror figure could be: The intimidating figure that can't be outrun (because he just runs so damn fast) and who always happens to have the bigger weapon (lol)... and the omnipresent figure whose intelligence can't be beat and who never has to run to catch his prey (this can include ethereal beings like ghosts).

for those of you not following my drift I'll give examples. An example of the the big-ass dude with a massive weapon would be in the Texas Chainsaw Massacre... Whats more intimidating than a guy most definitely twice your size running around with a F*&@ing chainsaw!

my next example is of the omnipresent horror figure who does not use brute strength to intimidate his prey. This could be like the ghost in the ring, the guy/girl in Saw that plays games, or Freddy Krueger. I mean, Freddy Krueger might have blades for fingers, but he's not really real... he works through nightmares and basically gives his victims the feeling that they can't fall asleep because he's always there.

In the end, everyone dies! But which is scarier? sliced to bits or scared to death?

Rot in Hell Rotten Tomatoes!

Okay, so eventually this blog will stray from the sole topic of movies... I promise. But for now, the movie ranting will continue.

As you may be aware, I'm pretty darn excited for the Friday the 13th movie, which I'll be seeing tonight (hopefully). Like with most movies, I go to Rotten tomatoes to get the scoop of what I'll be in for.


Not to my surprise, Rotten Tomatoes already has a harshly negative percentage for Friday the 13th (25% rotten when I checked). This is frustrating for a genre that will always be popular, but always negatively reviewed if things maintain the same. What's even more saddening is the negative reviewers said that the movie was made well, technically, but lacked a deep plot..

Slasher films are part of our culture. With that said we all know what we're getting when we go to see a slasher film: Nudity, Screaming, Gore, lack of plot, and pure awesome (slightly subjective?)

So why do horror movies continue to be made if they're all bad?... well, for their genre they aren't bad. Slasher films fill a niche that is bound to entertain some (like me), while disgust others. They aren't meant to be the next Slumdog Millionaire, although some may attempt this (with success or with complete failure... BTW Danny Boyle is my favorite director).

So now to my wishful thinking. I wish that critics would look at movies and take into account what they are going for. How can you rate a movie for lacking a plot when the most important aspect of the movie isn't the plot!? (last time I checked, I didn't get scared from a plot... maybe a few chills, but scared?.. no).

Rating movies shouldn't involve the same "rubric/grade sheet" to rate how good a movie is.. It wouldn't work, and I believe that many critics don't look at movies like this. They look at things like plot, acting, cinematography, soundtrack. Some of these might be important for most movies, but the amount that either makes or breaks a movie depends on the genre (good cinematography is important for me in just about any movie). Sound is much more important for a horror film than an action film, plot is more important for movies lacking any real excitement. etc (I'm sure you could think of genres that require different things).

Critics need to realize that a movie's purpose isn't always to mentally challenge the watcher, or to even require watchers to feel as though there is an underlying theme (although many horror movies do contain this subtle layer).

If society has decided that a plot is the most important part of a movie, then I may have to defect to a cave (I'd bring my laptop and a netflix subscription, though). Next time I rate a romantic comedy I'll be sure to rate it poorly for lacking the thrills that make a horror movie good, because to me that is what is important to a movie.

Numero Uno

In my attempt to stay current with technology I figured I should start a blog. Ideally, I would like to update somewhat frequently on things involving, but not limited to, my current musical tastes (which change often), my opinions on certain movies (with a certain preference to horror :P), and random things I encounter as a college student in Boston.

I guess I'll start with a short review of the movie Push. I saw it a few days ago so it's not as fresh in my mind as it should be for a review, but bear with me.

I'm not gonna do much of a synopsis.. Overall I thought the movie was decent. First off, it had psychics, which is pretty cool... and so the effects were pretty cool. Next, Dakota Fanning gets drunk... 'nuff said? lastly... well there's not so much more going for the movie, but if you're looking for something brainless this might be it... although I thought it dragged on a bit due to its poor choice in music (at least in my opinion), so the pacing of the movie could have been a tad bit better.

Now, onto better things. I'm really, really looking forward to the Last House on the Left. As with most horror movies I look forward to, it takes a lot to disappoint me, and I love the creative use of music in the trailer. One of my favorite movies, High Tension, made it to my top because of a single car chase scene with the Muse song "New Born"... so I really think that Music is an important aspect of horror films, and I might possibly write on that subject in a later blog.

-MATEO